|
800-236-6868 Professional Results Not Professional Models (Scroll Down for Gallery) |
|||
This is the technical term for what is otherwise known as a “nosejob.” Whether done in Madison, WI or anywhere else, rhinoplasty may be performed for cosmetic, reconstructive, or functional reasons. When done for functional reasons, the so called nose job may improve airflow. After trauma, the rhinoplasty surgeon may reposition displaced bones to improve airflow, and shape. When performed for cosmetic reasons, nose reshaping or re-contouring is used to change the appearance of the nose. This may be a subtle refinement, or a dramatic improvement. Any or all of the areas of the nose may be addressed, including the top (radix or root), the upper bony part (nasal bones), the softer middle (vault), and the tip. Even the nostrils may be reshaped. Parts of the nose may be augmented, reduced, or reshaped, asymmetry may be corrected.
Dr. Gerzenshtein performs rhinoplasty under general anesthesia in most cases. Less complicated nose reshaping surgery cases limited to a given nasal region may be done with a regional nerve block, and sedation in one of the Wisconsin or Wisconsin offices.
If your rhinoplasty surgery is performed under general anesthesia, then the answer is a definitive yes. Most people who receive local (and/or regional block) and intravenous sedation will also be asleep, though breathing on their own.
A surgical facility, a hospital, or in some cases a physician’s office may serve as the stage for rhinoplasty. The American Society of Plastic Surgeons (ASPS) 2004 data on cosmetic surgery procedures performed by members shows the following distribution: 62% - office, 21% - hospital, and 17% - ambulatory surgical facility. The Madison area is no different. Since most cases are performed under general anesthesia, Wisconsin and Wisconsin hospitals and surgical centers serve as operating facilities.
Though some surgeons will only get an imaging study when there is a breathing problem, most complicated, and secondary revisional rhinoplasty patients will need the so called CAT scan. In short the answer depends on the patient.
To the layperson the only discernible difference between open and closed rhinoplasty is a very well concealed ¼ inch scar at the base of the front underside part of the nose, between the nostrils. Surgeons joke that the scar may be noted only by a patient’s dog, or lover. The remainder of the incision is made inside the nose in both cases. Some surgeons perform one type of rhinoplasty exclusively. The more versatile surgeon can utilize both techniques with the following logic. The closed technique works well in less complicated cases, typically in removing a hump. The open technique is performed when correcting significant asymmetry, deviation, or when needing to do fine tip work. Open rhinoplasty and closed rhinoplasty are the two types of rhinoplasty procedures available. Open rhinoplasty is used to achieve great symmetry when doing tip work, while closed rhinoplasty is generally done for hump reduction.
References for distinctions between open and closed rhinoplasty...
Endonasal Rhinoplasty is just a fancy term for nose surgery done through an internal incision. It may sound better, and more technologically advanced, but in the end it is just a simple closed rhinoplasty in Madison, WI or anywhere else.
"Minimally invasive rhinoplasty" is another fancy name for nose surgery done through an internal incision. As is the case with endonasal rhinoplasty, it may sound better, and more technologically advanced, but in the end, it too is just a simple closed rhinoplasty, and is dependent entirely on who is doing it and not on where it is done.
Any surgical procedure carries with it three types of problems. The first is related to anesthesia; general, and less commonly local. The second category is common to all surgical procedures. This is the risk of bleeding, infection, loss of soft tissue, loss of skin, numbness, etc. The third is specific to the particular surgery being performed. In the case of rhinoplasty, this would be asymmetry, changes in appearance over time, etc.
References for risks or complications involved in rhinoplasty (nose reshaping)...
Each physician you see will have their own style of communication, this is independent of the location of the practice, be it in Madison, Wisconsin or Beverly Hills, California. I prefer to identify what particular features of the nose bother my patient most. Since everyone’s idea of the perfect nose varies widely, I like to hear what my patient would change about their nose. This gives me an idea as whether their expectation is realistic, and what features I would need to address. Most alterations are possible, but a patient’s nose must fit their face. If I believe a patient’s desires may leave them with a nose that does not fit their face I will explain this to the patient, and emphasize what I think would be an appropriate course of action. The patient is then evaluated for airflow problems, general medical problems, and undergoes a physical examination of the nose and associated structures. I explain the rhinoplasty surgery plan, all of the possible risks and complications, and also talk about what I think the outcome would be. If there are adjunctive procedures that would improve the patient’s appearance I discuss such measures.
Generally speaking, the answer is no. Most surgeons prefer to do rhinoplasty under general anesthesia. If anesthesia is given to a patient with even a partially full stomach, regurgitation of stomach contents into the lungs may occur, and this is very serious. In some cases, limited nasal work may be done without general anesthesia. Even in cases such as this, it is preferable not to eat since there is always a chance for general anesthesia if the case becomes more complicated during surgery or if there is persistent bleeding, or other unforeseen complication.
A surgical facility, a hospital, or in some cases a physician’s office may serve as the stage for rhinoplasty. The American Society of Plastic Surgeons (ASPS) 2004 data on cosmetic surgery procedures performed by members shows the following distribution: 62% - office, 21% - hospital, and 17% - ambulatory surgical facility. The Madison area is no different. Since most cases are performed under general anesthesia, Wisconsin and Wisconsin hospitals and surgical centers serve as operating facilities.
The sequence of operative maneuvers in rhinoplasty may change from surgeon to surgeon. As a general rule, once adequate anesthesia is established, either open or close incisions are made by Dr. Gerzenshtein, and the desired parts of bone and/or cartilage are appropriately reshaped. Once Dr. Gerzenshtein completes nasal sculpting, the skin is redraped, and the incisions closed. The patient recovers in an outpatient setting in the greater Madison area.
There are many options available to Dr. Gerzenshtein. Patient’s own tissue is a good option, though use of bone and some types of cartilage can result in warping and asymmetry in the years after surgery. More recently, alloderm, available here in Madison, a natural product has been used successfully, without the need for harvesting tissue from the patient, and subjecting another area to surgery.
In closed rhinoplasty the incisions go inside the nose, and are completely undetectable. In open rhinoplasty, the same incisions are used. In addition, the open rhinoplasty requires an incision under the column of the nose between the two nostrils. Generally, the incision heals so as to imperceptible within six months to one year.
The uncomplicated primary (first time) rhinoplasty is usually done at a Madison surgical center, and takes Dr. Gerzenshtein between 1 and ½ hours and 3 hours. The more complicated, and secondary nose surgery can take up to 6 hours, and will usually be done at a Madison area, or Wisconsin area hospital..
As long as goals are realistic and expectations appropriate, rhinoplasty as performed by Madison plastic surgeon Dr. Gerzenshtein can achieve dramatic results. The nasal bridge may be shaped in a number of desireable ways. The nose may be narrowed, widened, shortened, or lenghtened, dropped, or raised. The nasal tip may be reshaped to a more aesthetically pleasing form. The dynamic function of the nose may also be improved through alteration of the external or internal valves. In summary, the nose may be improved in many ways, but clear pre-operative objectives must be set to achieve the most personal result, as beauty is very much a reflection of a patient's perception, likes and dislikes.
Though all rhinoplasty patients recover at their own pace after nose reshaping, there are some general trends. The initial pain subsides over the course of two to three day. Swelling and discoloration may worsen after a rhinoplasty over the course of the same several days. It is a good idea to have someone at home to assist the patient in the immediate postoperative period. Strong pain medication will be needed in the first two weeks after rhinoplasty. Thereafter, normal, non-strenuous activities and work or school may be resumed. Swelling and bruising may persist for up to two months after nose reshaping surgery. Heavy exertion, and any activity, or contact sport that may result in injury should be avoided for first two post-operative months, as should sun exposure.
From a purely functional standpoint, unless your profession requires exertion and/or contact, normal activity may be resumed within seven to ten days after nose reshaping surgery. If it is important for you to maintain your privacy with respect to your surgery, post-rhinoplasty swelling will prevent your return for two to three weeks. In women, bruising may be camouflaged with makeup.
Congestion, inability to breathe through swollen air passages, the taste of blood are all problems that most rhinoplasty patients are bothered by more than pain. Pain is normal with any surgery, and is no worse with rhinoplasty.
Some patients may feel nauseous, and as a result not very hungry after the procedure. There are no restrictions on food consumption post-operatively, though it is wise to start with light liquids and proceed as tolerated.
No. Regardless of the type of anesthesia you’ve had, it is not safe to drive yourself home whether you are staying in the Chiicago area in Wisconsin, or in Wisconsin or traveling for a longer distance. For many reasons, this would be hazardous not only to your own well being, but also to other motorists. This is because the effects of even sedative anesthesia can last for several days.
The ability to function in the face of normal post-operative pain, and swelling depends on the individual patient undergoing rhinoplasty. As a rule, however, a friend or family member should remain with the patient for at least the duration of the first post-operative night.
My patients are typically seen twenty four to forty eight hours after rhinoplasty. Packing is removed at this visit. Weekly visits follow for the next two weeks. The patient is then seen at three, six, and 12 months after surgery. This is my regimen and it varies from surgeon to surgeon. If you live longer than 30 minutes from the Janesville facility, for instance in Madison, WI , the schedule may be modified.
References for followup appointments after nose reshaping surgery...
That depends on the type of nasal splint in question. External splints are used almost always, because some type of nasal bone reshaping is done as part of the rhinoplasty more often than not. When only nasal tip work is done, they may not be employed. When used they routinely stay on for two weeks. Internal splints are not used routinely. Typically, they are used in cases of the deviated nose or septum, where the partition of the two sides of the nose was reset. When used they are removed between postoperative day five and seven.
Internal stitches are used in both open and closed rhinoplasty, are absorbable, and do not need removal. External sutures are used only in cases of open rhinoplasty. They are removed between day five and seven.
If bone repositioning was not done, glasses may be worn as usual. For all other rhinoplasty cases, glasses my rest on top of the external nasal splint while it is in place. After the splint is removed, glasses should not be allowed to rest directly on the nose for one month, or a total of six weeks from the time of rhinoplasty.
The standard answer for many surgical procedures, nasal or otherwise, is six weeks. Contact sports should be avoided at least that long.
This is only partially true. Results are seen within one month, but there is still substantial swelling present. Even with this factor in play, patients notice a significant improvement in the shape of their nose. At six months, the appearance of the nose is remarkably close to what it would be after one year. At this point, only close comparison of photos would show the difference between six months, and one year. By one year, most of this swelling is gone, so that the final result is stable at one year. This is true of rhinoplasty performed by me in Janesville, Madison, or by other surgeons elsewhere.
To begin with, adequate time should be given for healing and resolution of swelling. Typically you will have a good idea of what your nose will ultimately look like after three months. If your nasal skin is excessively thick this may be closer to one year. If the perceived abnormality is still present after one year, additional surgery may be unavoidable to correct the problem.
Revision rhinoplasty is a procedure for correcting a previous nose reshaping procedure. It is also known as a secondary rhinoplasty. Because of previous dissection and alterations, the procedure is a bit more complicated and is generally longer.
Nasal packing is typically comprised of Vaseline gauze, or cotton. It is used in some, but not all rhinoplasty cases to control bleeding or to hold the partition between the two chambers of the nose in a stable position. It stays in for up to two days.
If the procedure is performed for a severe deficit, the psychological benefits would far outweigh any potential problems, so that in such cases there is no minimum age. For a more cosmetic rhinoplasty, it is best for hormonal changes and growth to be in its final stages, typically very little growth takes place after the age of 18. Older individuals may have rhinoplasty at any age, medical condition permitting.
Reference for appropriate age in patient selection for nose reshaping surgery...
Anyone with real concerns about the function or appearance of their nose makes a good candidate. Unrealistic expectations, deficits that only the patient can see, psycho-emotional instability, the belief that one’s entire life rests on undergoing the procedure are all red flags.
A minority of patients experience more discharge. This typically persists for half or a year, but may last longer.
Many people mistakenly believe that nose reshaping is done for cosmetic reasons only. In fact, many people who would benefit from a functional rhinoplasty would also get the side effect of a more balanced nose. This is because the septum, which lies at the root of many upper airway breathing difficulties also happens to form a very important structural component of the nose that impacts enormously on the external appearance of the nose. Deviation of the septum can cause significant breathing difficulties – a problem of much more import than the external appearance of the nose. Addressing this lopsided culprit, which by the way is often covered by most insurance carriers, will greatly aid nasal airflow, and fortunately, also improve nasal shape. In addition, in some cases of trauma, where the nasal bones have been misplaced, nasal airflow is also significantly compromised. Resetting the displaced bones will usually take care of the problem, and again, improve nasal shape. How is this done? Depending on the complexity of the problem, and the surgeon’s preference, the surgery may be performed through an open or closed approach. From a simplified perspective the only thing that separates the two approaches with respect to the final appearance is the presence of a small, usually imperceptible (except to the dog or the lover of the patient) scar at the top of cupid’s bow. From the surgeon’s standpoint, however, the addition of that small opening can greatly facilitate exposure, and help precise matching of one side to the other in the more involved case. To conclude, form is function and function is also form when it comes to nose surgery, fix your breathing, fix your nose.
References for functional rhinoplasty...There are several causes of the deviated nose. Most commonly, it is the result of trauma, motor vehicle accidents with facial trauma, altercations, falls, etc. Some people are born with a naturally divergent nose. In some cases, technical misadventures, or more commonly scarring after a rhinoplasty may cause this problem. Many times it is just a cosmetic nuisance, but it may also be significant enough to cause upper airway compromise, or breathing difficulties.
Septoplasty is the technical term for reshaping the partition between the two chambers of the nose. It is done for two main reasons – to straighten the crooked nose, or to relieve breathing difficulties.
This is the technical term for combining the straightening of the partition between the two nasal cavities with nose reshaping. It is usually, but not always, done through an open rhinoplasty approach.
It is possible to get financing for any surgical procedure, cosmetic or reconstructive. The details depend on your surgeon.
If the rhinoplasty is performed before growth is complete it is quite possible for the nose to continue to grow. This is the reason that rhinoplasty at an early age should be reserved for patients with significant defects.
The American Board of Plastic Surgery (ABPS) IS THE ONLY BOARD specialty recognized by the American Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME). This is the regulatory body overseeing resident education in ALL medical specialties including internal medicine, general surgery, etc. Any board which is not recognized by this entity is not subjected to its rules and regulations. The ACGME therefore does not recognize anyone trained in any program recognized by such an ARBITRARWIY defined board. The truth of the matter is that if anyone wanted to set up the American Board of Facial Upper Outer Eyelid Lash Surgeons, they could do so without any problems, without even so much as a medical degree. To the general public it would seem as though anyone trained in a “program” recognized by such a “board” has special training in the upper out part of the eyelid, and the upper outer eyelid surgeon would bask and revel in the fruits of this flagrant lie. The truth is that ACGME plastic surgery training takes from 6 to 8 years and encompasses all of plastic surgery, in its every detail. Surgeons not trained in such a manner typically have one year of so called “plastic” surgery and think themselves expert. Because they claim to be specialists in a particular area, an implication is made that they underwent plastic surgery training followed by specialty training. This is another blatant lie. Of course the public is unaware of any of this because the industry is only regulated on the postoperative lawsuit end. Don’t get me wrong, there are a few cosmetic surgeons, who are not plastic surgeons, who are quite good; there are exceptions to every rule. There is also a fair amount of ASPS surgeons who are quite bad, again not the rule. But to say that one NEEDS a surgeon who has this board certification not recognized by the ACGME is a preposterous flagrant lie. Another important consideration that is often ignored is the ethical character of the “surgeon.” Let’s suppose someone is not certified by the American Board of Plastic Surgery, let’s also suppose that they are really good with their hands, and have done many, many aesthetic procedures. How many people would have had to be their “first,” in any given procedure before they accumulated enough experience to obtain good, reproducible results. Would you really want a “physician” of such limited moral fiber to do your surgery? The bottom line is this; what you need is an honest physician, who is safe, gets good results, and is strongly endorsed by his or her patients, not someone who couldn’t get into a plastic surgery program, not someone who realized late in their career that aesthetic surgery is lucrative and decided to take a shortcut, and not the founder of the American Board of the Middle Upper Lip Cosmetico - Aesthetic Surgery.
1: |
Cardenas JC, Carvajal J.
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2007 Jul 25; [Epub ahead of print]
PMID: 17653684 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]
2: |
Endoscopic septoplasty: revisitation of the technique, indications, and outcomes. |
Chung BJ, Batra PS, Citardi MJ, Lanza DC.
Am J Rhinol. 2007 May-Jun;21(3):307-11.
PMID: 17621814 [PubMed - in process]
3: |
Swartout B, Toriumi DM.
Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007 Aug;15(4):219-27.
PMID: 17620894 [PubMed - in process]
4: |
Gilbert PM, Taghizadeh R.
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2007;60(8):970-1. Epub 2007 Mar 9. No abstract available.
PMID: 17616374 [PubMed - in process]
5: |
Tutoplast-processed fascia lata for dorsal augmentation in rhinoplasty. |
Jang YJ, Wang JH, Sinha V, Song HM, Lee BJ.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007 Jul;137(1):88-92.
PMID: 17599572 [PubMed - in process]
6: |
High prevalence of personality abnormalities in patients seeking rhinoplasty. |
Zojaji R, Javanbakht M, Ghanadan A, Hosien H, Sadeghi H.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007 Jul;137(1):83-7.
PMID: 17599571 [PubMed - in process]
7: |
The use of expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (gore-tex) in rhinoplasty. |
Gruber R.
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2007 Jul-Aug;31(4):349. No abstract available.
PMID: 17594121 [PubMed - in process]
8: |
Buyuklu F, Cakmak O.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007 Jul;120(1):348-9. No abstract available.
PMID: 17572588 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
9: |
Whitaker IS, Karoo RO, Spyrou G, Fenton OM.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007 Jul;120(1):327-36.
PMID: 17572582 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
10: |
Totonchi A, Guyuron B.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007 Jul;120(1):271-4.
PMID: 17572575 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
11: |
Peterson J, Rowley M.
Cutis. 2007 May;79(5):383-6.
PMID: 17569401 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
12: |
Lo S, Rowe-Jones J.
J Laryngol Otol. 2007 Aug;121(8):e10. Epub 2007 Jun 7.
PMID: 17553187 [PubMed - in process]
13: |
The central role of the nose in the face and the psyche: review of the nose and the psyche. |
Amodeo CA.
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2007 Jul-Aug;31(4):406-10.
PMID: 17551776 [PubMed - in process]
14: |
Use of 6-Year-Old Preserved Autogenous Septal Cartilage in Secondary Rhinoplasty. |
Agir H, Sen C, Isil E, Gurbuz Y.
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2007 Aug;31(4):411-412. No abstract available.
PMID: 17551774 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]
15: |
Rotation flap for the reconstruction of alar cartilage agenesis. |
Araco A, Gravante G, Araco F, Bottini DJ, Delogu D, Grimaldi M, Cervelli V.
Dermatol Surg. 2007 Jun;33(6):768-70. No abstract available.
PMID: 17550464 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
16: |
The fate of diced cartilage grafts of traumatized versus nontraumatized origin. |
Arslan E, Majka C, Polat A.
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2007 Jul-Aug;31(4):365-71.
PMID: 17549560 [PubMed - in process]
17: |
Decreased acne symptoms as a perception of rhinoplasty success. |
Coban YK.
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2007 Jul-Aug;31(4):413-4. No abstract available.
PMID: 17549552 [PubMed - in process]
18: |
Bottini DJ, Gentile P, Arpino A, Dasero G, Cervelli V.
J Craniofac Surg. 2007 May;18(3):516-9.
PMID: 17538311 [PubMed - in process]
19: |
van Hemert FJ, de Bree R, Leemans CR, Middelweerd MJ.
Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2007 May-Jun;9(3):201-4.
PMID: 17519209 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
20: |
Wang TD.
Facial Plast Surg. 2007 May;23(2):123-7.
PMID: 17516339 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
21: |
Tatum SA.
Facial Plast Surg. 2007 May;23(2):91-9.
PMID: 17516335 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
22: |
Placement of a lateral nasal suspension suture via an external rhinoplasty approach. |
Roofe SB, Most SP.
Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2007 May-Jun;9(3):214-6. No abstract available.
PMID: 17515499 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
23: |
Objective assessment of facial asymmetry in rhinoplasty patients. |
Chatrath P, De Cordova J, Nouraei SA, Ahmed J, Saleh HA.
Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2007 May-Jun;9(3):184-7.
PMID: 17515495 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
24: |
Schonauer F, La Rusca I, Molea G.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007 Apr 1;119(4):1383-5. No abstract available.
PMID: 17496624 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
25: |
Agarwal A, Gracely E, Silver WE.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007 Apr 1;119(4):1343-51; discussion 1352-3.
PMID: 17496610 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
26: |
[Variants of plastic operations on the anterior wall of the frontal sinus] |
Artem'ev ME, Mironov AA, Kudriavtseva IuS, Surikov EV.
Vestn Otorinolaringol. 2007;(1):41-2. Russian.
PMID: 17495803 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
27: |
Heppt W, Gubisch W.
HNO. 2007 Jun;55(6):497-510. Review. German.
PMID: 17486306 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
28: |
Leiomyoma of the nasal dorsum and excision with open rhinoplasty approach. |
Cizmeci O, Tuncer S, Tuzlali S.
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2007;60(6):689-90. Epub 2007 Jan 30. No abstract available.
PMID: 17485062 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
29: |
Turn-in folding of the cephalic portion of the lateral crus to support the alar rim in rhinoplasty. |
Tellioglu AT, Cimen K.
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2007 May-Jun;31(3):306-10.
PMID: 17484064 [PubMed - in process]
30: |
Ultrasound piezoelectric vibrations to perform osteotomies in rhinoplasty. |
Robiony M, Polini F, Costa F, Toro C, Politi M.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007 May;65(5):1035-8. No abstract available.
PMID: 17448859 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
31: |
Cillo JE Jr, Caloss R, Miles BA, Ellis E 3rd.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007 May;65(5):1017-22. No abstract available.
PMID: 17448856 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
32: |
Burns P, Miller I, Timon C, Walsh M.
J Laryngol Otol. 2007 Apr 20;:1-4 [Epub ahead of print]
PMID: 17445310 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]
33: |
Cordova A, Di Lorenzo S, Moschella F.
Int J Dermatol. 2007 Apr;46(4):417-21.
PMID: 17442089 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
34: |
Manavbasi I, Agaoglu G.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007 May;119(6):1961-2. No abstract available.
PMID: 17440399 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
35: |
Gruber RP.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007 May;119(6):1945-6. No abstract available.
PMID: 17440381 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
36: |
Gruber RP, Park E, Newman J, Berkowitz L, Oneal R.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007 May;119(6):1903-10.
PMID: 17440373 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
37: |
Byrd HS, Meade RA, Gonyon DL Jr.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007 May;119(6):1897-902.
PMID: 17440372 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
38: |
The role of apoptosis in traumatic versus nontraumatic nasal septal cartilage. |
Gorur K, Polat G, Ozcan C, Arslan E, Vayisoglu Y, Ozturk OG, Bagdatoglu O.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007 May;119(6):1773-6; discussion 1777-8.
PMID: 17440353 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
39: |
Turan A, Kul Z, Turkaslan T, Ozyigit T, Ozsoy Z.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007 May;119(6):1767-72.
PMID: 17440352 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
40: |
A surgical algorithm using open rhinoplasty for correction of traumatic twisted nose. |
Hsiao YC, Kao CH, Wang HW, Moe KS.
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2007 May-Jun;31(3):250-8.
PMID: 17437155 [PubMed - in process]
41: |
Measuring nasal tip and lobule width; effect of transdomal and lateral crura suturing. |
Ingels K, Orhan KS.
Rhinology. 2007 Mar;45(1):79-82.
PMID: 17432076 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
42: |
Nasolabial hinge flap with simultaneous cartilage graft in nasal alar and tip reconstruction. |
Azaria R, Adler N, Ad-El D.
Dermatol Surg. 2007 Apr;33(4):476-83. No abstract available.
PMID: 17430383 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
43: |
Correction of caudal septal deviation: use of a caudal septal extension graft. |
Pham AM, Tollefson TT.
Ear Nose Throat J. 2007 Mar;86(3):142, 144. No abstract available.
PMID: 17427774 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
44: |
Endoscopic view of a powered partial resection of a concha bullosa. |
Christmas DA Jr, Mirante JP, Yanagisawa E.
Ear Nose Throat J. 2007 Mar;86(3):132-3. No abstract available.
PMID: 17427769 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
45: |
Vural E.
J Craniofac Surg. 2007 Mar;18(2):442-5.
PMID: 17414299 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
46: |
Gerarchi P, Mendelsohn M.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007 Apr;136(4S):S32-S40.
PMID: 17398339 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]
47: |
[Investigation of the layers and vascular density of the soft tissue in the inferior nasal] |
Wang ZJ, Wang N, Yang HM, Bai SL.
Zhonghua Zheng Xing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2007 Jan;23(1):65-8. Chinese. -
PMID: 17393700 [PubMed - in process]
48: |
Draper MR, Salam MA, Kumar S.
J Otolaryngol. 2007 Feb;36(1):13-6.
PMID: 17376345 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
49: |
Murrell GL.
Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2007 Mar-Apr;9(2):141-2; author reply 142-3. No abstract available.
PMID: 17372073 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
50: |
Constantinidis J.
Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2007 Mar-Apr;9(2):139. No abstract available.
PMID: 17372071 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
51: |
Stupak HD, Moulthrop TH, Wheatley P, Tauman AV, Johnson CM Jr.
Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2007 Mar-Apr;9(2):130-6.
PMID: 17372068 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
52: |
Tollefson TT, Sykes JM.
Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2007 Mar-Apr;9(2):113-9.
PMID: 17372065 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
53: |
Yang KC, Tseng WK, Kuo YS, Wu CC.
Ann Emerg Med. 2007 Apr;49(4):542-3. No abstract available.
PMID: 17371712 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
54: |
Trenite GJ.
B-ENT. 2006;2 Suppl 4:102-8.
PMID: 17366854 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
55: |
Management of severe tip ptosis in closed rhinoplasty: the horizontal columellar strut. |
Margulis A, Harel M.
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2007;60(4):400-6. Epub 2006 Dec 29.
PMID: 17349596 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
56: |
Arosarena OA.
Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2007 Feb;40(1):27-60, vi. Review.
PMID: 17346560 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
57: |
Erkan AN, Cakmak O, Kocer NE, Yilmaz I.
Laryngoscope. 2007 Mar;117(3):491-6.
PMID: 17334310 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
58: |
Dayan SH.
Facial Plast Surg. 2007 Feb;23(1):62-9; discussion 70-9.
PMID: 17330776 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
59: |
Long-lasting injectable implant* for correcting cosmetic nasal deformities. |
Dayan SH, Greene RM, Chambers AA.
Ear Nose Throat J. 2007 Jan;86(1):25-6. Review. No abstract available.
PMID: 17315830 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
60: |
Rhinoplasty: septal saddle nose deformity and composite reconstruction. |
Daniel RK.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007 Mar;119(3):1029-43.
PMID: 17312511 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
61: |
Jung DH, Lansangan LJ, Choi JM, Jang TY, Lee JJ.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007 Mar;119(3):885-90.
PMID: 17312492 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
62: |
Deviated nose correction by using the spreader graft in the convex side. |
Oliveira PW, Pezato R, Gregorio LC.
Rev Bras Otorrinolaringol (Engl Ed). 2006 Nov-Dec;72(6):760-3.
PMID: 17308828 [PubMed - in process]
63: |
The scalping forehead flap in nasal reconstruction: report of 2 cases. |
Thomaidis V, Seretis K, Fiska A, Tamiolakis D, Karpouzis A, Tsamis I.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007 Mar;65(3):532-40. No abstract available.
PMID: 17307604 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
64: |
Jeannon JP, Riddle PJ, Irish J, O'sullivan B, Brown DH, Gullane P.
Clin Otolaryngol. 2007 Feb;32(1):19-23.
PMID: 17298305 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
65: |
Effect of nasal tip surgery on asian noses using the transdomal suture technique. |
Jang TY, Choi YS, Jung YG, Kim KT, Kim KS, Choi JS.
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2007 Mar-Apr;31(2):174-8.
PMID: 17294341 [PubMed - in process]
66: |
[Nasal reconstruction with a three-staged forehead flap: assessment of 16 cases] |
Nicolas J, Labbe D, Soubeyrand E, Guillou-Jamard MR, Rysanek B, Compere JF, Benateau H.
Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac. 2007 Feb;108(1):21-8; discussion 28-30. Epub 2007 Jan 9. French.
PMID: 17275048 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
67: |
Versatility of cartilage grafts: reimplantation after a second nasal trauma. |
Araco A, Gravante G, Araco F, Castri F, Delogu D, Cervelli V.
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2006 Nov-Dec;10(6):347-9. No abstract available.
PMID: 17274539 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
68: |
[Surgical treatment of breathing troubles in children's upper respiratory tract] |
Chmielik M.
Otolaryngol Pol. 2006;60(5):675-82. Review. Polish.
PMID: 17263238 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
69: |
Use of the spring graft for prevention of midvault complications in rhinoplasty. |
Sen C, Iscen D.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007 Jan;119(1):332-6.
PMID: 17255690 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
70: |
Cho BC.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007 Jan;119(1):267-75; discussion 276.
PMID: 17255682 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
71: |
Ercan I, Etoz A, Guney I, Ocakoglu G, Turan-Ozdemir S, Kan I, Kahveci R.
J Craniofac Surg. 2007 Jan;18(1):219-24.
PMID: 17251867 [PubMed - in process]
72: |
Different surgical treatments for nasal septal perforation and their outcomes. |
Goh AY, Hussain SS.
J Laryngol Otol. 2007 May;121(5):419-26. Epub 2007 Jan 25.
PMID: 17250780 [PubMed - in process]
73: |
Effect of dexmedetomidine on bleeding during tympanoplasty or septorhinoplasty. |
Durmus M, But AK, Dogan Z, Yucel A, Miman MC, Ersoy MO.
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2007 May;24(5):447-53. Epub 2007 Jan 23.
PMID: 17241505 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
74: |
Ozsoy Z, Gozu A, Kul Z, Erkalp K, Zulfikar B.
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2007 Jan-Feb;31(1):101-3.
PMID: 17235465 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
75: |
A new face by combined surgery for patients with complex dentofacial deformity. |
Guzel MZ, Sarac M, Arslan H, Nejat E, Nazan K.
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2007 Jan-Feb;31(1):32-41.
PMID: 17235458 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
76: |
Augmentation mentoplasty with diced high-density porous polyethylene. |
Gurlek A, Frat C, Aydogan H, Celik M, Ersoz-Ozturk A, Klnc H.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007 Feb;119(2):684-91.
PMID: 17230108 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
77: |
Berger G, Bernheim J, Ophir D.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007 Jan;133(1):78-82.
PMID: 17224530 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
78: |
Analysis of the physical properties of costal cartilage in a porcine model. |
Lopez MA, Shah AR, Westine JG, O'Grady K, Toriumi DM.
Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2007 Jan-Feb;9(1):35-9.
PMID: 17224486 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
79: |
Nasal base narrowing: the combined alar base excision technique. |
Foda HM.
Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2007 Jan-Feb;9(1):30-4.
PMID: 17224485 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
80: |
A review of 25-year experience of nasal septal perforation repair. |
Pedroza F, Patrocinio LG, Arevalo O.
Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2007 Jan-Feb;9(1):12-8.
PMID: 17224482 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
81: |
Boccieri A, Marano A.
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2007;60(2):188-94. Epub 2006 May 26.
PMID: 17223517 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
82: |
Burm JS.
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2007;60(2):180-7. Epub 2006 Jun 5.
PMID: 17223516 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
83: |
Combined use of triple cartilage grafts in secondary rhinoplasty. |
Arslan E, Majka C, Beden V.
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2007;60(2):171-9. Epub 2006 Jul 10.
PMID: 17223515 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
84: |
Kim JS, Han KH, Choi TH, Kim NG, Lee KS, Son DG, Kim JH.
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2007;60(2):163-70. Epub 2006 Jun 5.
PMID: 17223514 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
85: |
Menger DJ, Fokkens WJ, Lohuis PJ, Ingels KJ, Nolst Trenite GJ.
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2007;60(2):152-62. Epub 2006 Sep 14.
PMID: 17223513 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
86: |
Smadja J.
Dermatol Surg. 2007 Jan;33(1):76-81.
PMID: 17214683 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
87: |
Draper BK, Wentzell JM.
Dermatol Surg. 2007 Jan;33(1):17-22. Review.
PMID: 17214674 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
88: |
Lipoma of the nasal dorsum: an unusual presentation of a common neoplasm. |
Pryor SG, Orvidas LJ, Moore EJ.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007 Jan;136(1):151-2. No abstract available.
PMID: 17210358 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
89: |
A technical refinement to prevent supratip deformity in aesthetic rhinoplasty: "the trapezoid peak". |
Campus GV, Farace F, Rubino C, Sanna MP.
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2007 Jan-Feb;31(1):88-93.
PMID: 17205253 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
90: |
Reconstruction of the distal third of the nose with composite ear-helix free flap. |
Ozek C, Gurler T, Uckan A, Bilkay U.
Ann Plast Surg. 2007 Jan;58(1):74-7.
PMID: 17197947 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
91: |
[Management of the nasal base by resecting strips of skin from the columnella] |
Ramirez Oropeza FJ, Saynes Marin FJ, Herrera Chavez ME.
Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp. 2006 Nov;57(9):405-11. Spanish.
PMID: 17184009 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
92: |
A multicenter evaluation of the safety of Gore-Tex as an implant in Asian rhinoplasty. |
Jin HR, Lee JY, Yeon JY, Rhee CS.
Am J Rhinol. 2006 Nov-Dec;20(6):615-9.
PMID: 17181104 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
93: |
Key maneuvers for successful correction of a deviated nose in Asians. |
Jin HR, Lee JY, Shin SO, Choi YS, Lee DW.
Am J Rhinol. 2006 Nov-Dec;20(6):609-14.
PMID: 17181103 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
94: |
Hodgkinson DJ.
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2007 Jan-Feb;31(1):28-31.
PMID: 17180744 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
95: |
Riedel F, Bersch C, Hormann K.
HNO. 2007 Jun;55(6):472-4. German. No abstract available.
PMID: 17180694 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
96: |
Nieczuj-Urbanska J, Sitek A, Kruk-Jeromin J, Antoszewski B.
Otolaryngol Pol. 2006;60(4):537-42. Polish.
PMID: 17152806 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
97: |
Numa W, Eberlin K, Hamdan US.
Laryngoscope. 2006 Dec;116(12):2171-7.
PMID: 17146392 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
98: |
[Appraisal of augmentation rhinoplasty with 3-dimension CT investigation] |
Liu YF, Gui L, Zhang ZY, Li HC.
Zhonghua Zheng Xing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2006 Sep;22(5):351-3. Chinese.
PMID: 17144450 [PubMed - in process]
99: |
Patrocinio LG, Carvalho PM, de Souza HM, Couto HG, Patrocinio JA.
Rev Bras Otorrinolaringol (Engl Ed). 2006 Jul-Aug;72(4):439-42.
PMID: 17143420 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
100: |
Does corticosteroid usage in rhinoplasty cause mood changes? |
Ozdel O, Kara CO, Kara IG, Sevinc D, Oguzhanoglu NK, Topuz B.
Adv Ther. 2006 Sep-Oct;23(5):809-16.
PMID: 17142217 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
© 2007 Dr. Gerzenshtein